SEAGATE BLACKARMOR NAS 220 2-BAY 4 TB (2 X 2 TB) NETWORK ATTACHED STORAGE ST340005LSA10G-RK REVIEWS
SALE Price: $ 389.95
USERS REVIEWS:
Perhaps 1/20th the speed at which I could write to the NAS. For the most part on machines of this degree those functions are gimmicks. The main point I use this NAS for is to perform movies that I have ripped from my DVD collection. I really feel like I am in a very good spot to evaluation this item simply because I very own each the Seagate 220 and also the Western Digital MyBook Planet Edition, and they are competitors. Anyway I attempted numerous remedies (modifying the frame size and so forth). two. A couple of comparisons with the Western Digital:1. The Seagate is substantially louder than the Western Digital. In other words, the gadget this is right plugged into matters, the rest of the network genuinely does not. Anyway, on with the critique. This machine is substantially more rapidly than the Western Digital. It is not loud compared to most hardware, but you can hear the drives spinning if you get near and listen, and when they start up or go to rest you can hear a click that is pretty obvious. two.
Read much more. They do not work. Anyway, the remedy is to truly map the drive in “My Pc” as an substitute of just making use of a shortcut to get to it. If I plugged the NAS directly into my Linksys router, the issue went away, but that is only a a hundred-megabit connection. Each are affordable network attached storage appropriate for a property office or for home use. You’d think there would be no distinction between individuals two, but the former functions and the latter disconnects immediately after 20 minutes. one. Notably it does not work with D-Hyperlink switches. I initially thought this had to do with the NAS going into rest mode, but I disabled that characteristic and it did not alter anything. Occasionally it clicks when no a single is utilizing it and you would think it would just be sleeping peacefully. They aren’t genuine pricey, but I was extremely annoyed at this dilemma. When I upload to this machine from my Linux box I sustain about 18 or 19 megabytes per second. When I want to perform media from my NAS, I just mount the drive by way of windows sharing and play what I want. For the purpose I have a usually more favourable view of each of these machines than other people. This is a little problem, and partly windows’ fault: If you generate a shortcut to this shared drive in windows and then play a motion picture from the NAS, it will disconnect twenty minutes into the movie. Nevertheless, I also did a speed check using JBOD and the speeds have been exactly the very same, so the obtain is not really from the RAID (the WD I use has only 1 HD in it, so there is no RAID choice). Really I am not confident how numerous movies I can play at a time. Properly, I will add TP-Link to the list it doesn’t perform with. This might not sound like a big variation here, but when duplicating a big file or backing up a total pc, it tends to make a very obvious difference. I do not pay out a lot of attention to my download copy speed, but it is over 30 MB per 2nd, whereas I get much more like 19 from the Western Digital. Very first I will mention two troubles I had to conquer prior to this NAS was reasonably functional for me. If your network has a TP-Link or D-Link switch or router that you’d like to plug this into, spending budget for a netgear gigabit switch. . It’s just louder than expected. Right after investing a very good deal of time studying the issue on the web I identified out the NAS does not play nicely with some routers and switches. When I want to back up my laptop or computer, I copy things myself. This is the big concern I had to fix: This Seagate NAS does not operate properly with just any gigabit switch. Nor have I tried playing any HD films nevertheless, so I can’t comment on that, but the speed above my gigabit network appears a lot more than sufficient for that. I originally had it plugged in to a TP-Link switch. I am running this in a RAID configuration. Possessing overcome these two difficulties, the NAS now functions really nicely for me. They do not function really well and they degrade overall overall performance of the NAS, as you will be ready to go through from other people’s critiques. It is virtually extremely hard to tell if the WD machine is on or carrying out anything at all if you ignore the lights on the front (or. They play absolutely on any pc in the residence and I can even perform two motion photos on two different computers. . I could write to the NAS at complete speed, but when I desired to study from it, the speed was horrible. On the Western Digital I get about 11. At initial I believed this was a hardware difficulty but it turns out that my NAS is fine. The only answer was to purchase a netgear switch. For that explanation I will not comment also much on some of the functions like automated backups, media sharing, and so on. The humorous issue is that the traffic nonetheless had to go via the TP-Link switch. For both machines the only feature I use is reading and writing to the hard drive via windows sharing (from both a windows personal or a linux laptop or computer). Of program, WD sets the bar big for silence. I did not recognize the problem when playing from my linux machine, and the WD NAS does not do this
. I opted for increased reliability. ten/kWh is about annually if it is operating 24/7. 6. I gave it 4 stars in the functions place since it could be a small over simplified, but that is only because I am a energy consumer. I will even advocate this merchandise to little organizations who need to have network storage. The simplicity: I plugged it in and went to the web based mostly console (no software program required) and answered a number of concerns and I was completed. Also, the Total Expense of Ownership (TCO) is quite very low. The energy consumption + noise: I figured I would hide this somewhere to avert hearing it, but its so quiet that I maintain it on top rated of my desk so I can see it. All in all, I am really pleased with it. The 2 TB unit has two one-terabyte drives and gives you the capability to choose regardless of whether you want far more area (RAID ) or far more reliability (RAID one). It performs from Windows seven, Windows Vista, Windows XP and OS X 10. There are 3 items that genuinely impressed me with this solution: The speed: With the RAID 1 setup, when you read a file from the NAS, you happen to be reading it from 2 tough rives simultaneously, and more than a gigabit connection this signifies I can copy files from the difficult drive at 40 megabytes per second. Evaluate this to a Pc file server which can price a couple of hundred dollars in electrical energy. Composing is half that, about 20 megabytes per 2nd. I have owned the Seagate NAS 220 for about a month now and I have been blown away. When studying/writing from the drive, it utilizes about 18 watts, which at $ . It has an vehicle sleep mode which can make the TCO even reduced. It really is visually appealing to search at
If you are hunting for a drive you can plug in and use, you might need to have to do a bit of work to get this up and running, but as soon as configured – it is hands off for anything else. By employing mirroring, the two disks have precisely the very same details on them which will often give you a backup if one of the drives fails. It does not have wireless connectivity, but if you connect it into a wireless hub, you can access it via a wireless device (e. I have worked in IT since 1983. It comes with a utility for Windows Computers to detect the unit on the network – but the web interface need to be utilized to configure the device so if you happen to be employing MAC/LINUX, you will want to know how to search at your router to figure out what IP deal with the machine got, if you have automatic IP addressing (DHCP) on your router/hub. The machine plugs directly on your residence network (router/hub) and can be accessed by any device that will connect to a ‘shared’ drive. If you do not use mirroring, you get four terabytes of area but if you eliminate a drive due to failure, you lose the information on that drive. I hugely advocate employing mirroring – This way, if both one particular of the drives fails, you can change it and not drop your data. a wireless laptop running iTunes or Windows Media or just as a shared drive). I would not advocate this to somebody who does not have a good comprehension of setting up disk shares/consumers/groups or is not willing to analyze up on these subjects to configure the gadget. RAID one). From there you use the IP deal with to get to the gadget by way of a web browser. Nevertheless, if you are employing this in a family setting and you want to setup separate areas for each member of the loved ones (or create a ‘private’ place only accessible to a choose group) then this unit can do this – but you need to know what you are performing. It also has a wiki attribute – though I can not discover a use for it at residence but might operate in a modest office environment or if you retain track of factors (recipes??) and want a storage mechanism. k. This unit also can be configured to send e-mail alerts for several occasions (reboot, shutdown) and has a net interface for configuration. I have purchased and lost two Western Digital units (USB/Firewire) and will by no means get yet another. For those who are not technologically savvy (I’m attempting to leave out most of the technobabble right here), some of the settings might be a bit daunting (NFS, CIFS, FTP) and the notion of creating ‘shares’ and setting entry ranges and generating consumer accounts. Compared to Western Digital, Seagate (in my viewpoint and encounter) has a lot more reputable disk drives. If you have someone in your loved ones who’s excellent with personal computers, ask for support to set it up – it is worth finding this unit especially in a multi-user setting. This was an important attribute for me – I depend on it to keep the bulk of my information with out having to do normal backups (who does individuals at home??). If you are by yourself and/or know extremely little about personal systems and never require the device to be accessible by any other than 1 Pc, think about one thing you can connect directly to your Personal personal rather. It’s relatively effortless to setup for the technically savvy but not so straightforward to setup if you are a laptop or personal novice. The Windows utility does this effortlessly, but it really is not also challenging if you know how to do the above. The only downside of mirroring is that you shed half of the room because each drives ‘mirror’ each other and consist of exactly the identical information. I have had tons of units (Western Digital – UGH!) and this Seagate unit has been the ideal of it really is variety, however it really is not for the technologically challenged. g. This unit has a ‘media service’ that lets you publish a share as a music source and access it from iTunes on other personal computers. This unit comes with two-2 terabyte drives which can utilised separately or be configured in a mirror formation (a. . It can be accessed by means of a variety of file sharing protocols so if you have received a blended atmosphere at home (Windows, MAC, Linux), this machine is great. a. If you want to have a unit that you can use for all of your data and retailer your iTunes on it (and entry it from MAC and Windows and Linux as I do), then this unit is an outstanding choice



