D-Link DNS-320


Rating:

SALE Price: $ 149.99



USERS REVIEWS:

Other individuals who have utilized this unit with the AFT drives have been mixed: It worked for some, and not for other folks. I also use the DNS-343 in my office as a backup of my workstation, and this DNS-343 is backed up remotely to my home DNS-343. These performed almost similarly, with a slight reduce in study and compose overall performance (although not huge, perhaps one-2 MB/s or at times more) I gave this NAS back to my sister with the 2x2TB green drives. No issues with the setup (although I did execute a manual setup using the gadget IP). (I am also tempted to try the upgraded version, the DNS-325, which has a 50% quicker processor and double the RAM than the DNS-320. I have almost 1TB really worth of photos, and MP3 files, and more than 2TB of residence videos stored on my principal desktop Personal (WinXP Pro SP3), accessible to other personal personal on my home network as a shared folder. I utilised a linux box to execute “diff -r” to make certain the information was not corrupted, and no corruption was identified. If you are not familiar with how to do a manual setup, I very propose to use the ShareCenter Personal software CD, which comes with the product. Consequently, these drives runs a lot cooler than the 7200 WD drives. . Amazing! I then inserted an additional drive (Seagate Barracuda 1TB 7200) and the DNS-320 formatted and synchronized the new disk, which took a few hrs. This is sufficient for me to dock one star from what would have otherwise been an excellent NAS device. Otherwise, you can skip. ” The DNS-320 detected a disk failure inside of seconds and notified me by means of e-mail.

Read far more. It goes by way of a step-by-step process of how to set up the unit. The firmware was already the most up-to-date edition, so no need to upgrade. I am not sure why the difference amongst Personal and Mac, and might possibly be inherent to the distinct file systems between the two OS. I popped in two WD Caviar Black 1TB drives (these were my spare drives), linked the electrical power and network cables and driven up, logged in using net GUI and configured the gadget for my network and use (DDNS, e-mail settings, etc), formatted and setup drives for RAID1 (format did not hang at 94%), and it was up and operating. My only criticism is the lack of details whether or not this can take care of the advanced format drives like the newer WD or Seagate 2TB green drives. Possessing tested the DNS-320, I am fairly impressed with its abilities and I am now taking into consideration buying two to backup my DNS-343 (4x2TB configuration). Overall, it is a excellent small unit. With real world files, I got anyplace between 20-30 MB/s on both personal (UPDATE new test yielded 20-40 MB/s). Nontheless these numbers are fairly outstanding, and far superior than I anticipated. Read speed – I copied the film file from the DNS-320 to my Pc and I got 26-30 MB/s (UPDATED new test yielded 30-40 MB/s), and 35-50 MB/s for my Mac. All the initial testing I did at my home utilizing a D-Hyperlink DIR-655 Gigabit wireless N Router and gigabit ethernet on a WinXP Pro SP3 desktop and a Mac Pro (OSX SL). No information is accessible on the D-Hyperlink support area. Highly suggested. five” Internal SATA Difficult Drive Ports * 1 x ten/one hundred/1000 Gigabit Ethernet Port ƒ USB Port Drive Management * Four Different Hard Drive Configurations (RAID , one, JBOD, Common) * Drive Status with E-mail Alerts * Drive Quotas * Electrical power Management Device Management * Web Explorer® v6 or other Java-enabled. Write speed – From my desktop Personal (WinXP SP3), I copied significant motion picture files (over 1GB per file), and I calculated a transfer speed of about 16-20 MB/s (UPDATED new test yielded 18-23 MB/s). CPU 800 MHz RAM 128MB RAM „×3. ) WARNING: GEEK ALERT Beneath For a handful of technical particulars, see below. With genuine planet files (varying in size from a number of kb to 10MB), I got anywhere in between 12 to 18 MB/s on the two personal systems. Very first and foremost, I tested this device by simulating a disk failure, and the answer is a resounding YES. From my Mac, I copied an additional set of motion picture files and got 22-26 MB/s (UPDATED new test yielded 24-28 MB/s). Until I try out it myself, I can’t make any definitive conclusions. ) so that the complete household can access them. I did not test this side-by-side against my DNS-343, which could be my up coming project. . I removed 1 of the drives to simulate a “disk failure. I also attempted a pair of WD 2TB drives (WD20EADS), which are WD green drives but not the advanced formatting version (EARS). These files are backed up to a DNS-343 NAS box (4x2TB drives), and is backed up remotely to an identical DNS-343 box in my workplace (off-web site). I received this NAS box from my sister, who asked me to 1) try out out this DNS-320 out as a central file storage device, and 2) to set it up for her property, of course I agreed! She wishes to centralize her files (photos, music, films, and so forth

You can plug in a flash drive in the front and press the button to create a backup, which is a neat function. Pros: This model is an improvement above the DNS-321, which tops out at 14-16MBps for write speeds. Other/Unknowns: Big note here: You will have to format any drives you use within this point, so do not stick in a drive with the only copy of your critical information on it! The fan does develop some noise when running, but I picture most men and women will tuck these away someplace so it shouldn’t be an issue. Reading through speeds vary from 30MBps to 52MBps. For other XBMC-on-Windows customers, I’d advocate mapping by means of it the UNC address (like \NASVolume_1) as an substitute of mapping it via a drive letter in Windows. Cons: Like Windows, the performance looks to reduce more than time so I’d advise periodic reboots. I played around with the uPnP / DLNA function and that appears to perform fine. You might be ready to squeeze out a tiny much more functionality with a various drive, but these speeds are probably limited by the NAS itself. Right after a reboot, I was capable to get 20MBps again. You can routine it to turn off, but not to reboot. When the NAS goes to sleep Windows drops the connection and your apps might well hiccup ahead of it absolutely wakes, which is 10 seconds or significantly less. I left it on for two weeks and was only capable to get publish speeds of 10MBps. Summary: In the finish, I am thrilled with this unit. There are some cons but they are not significant enough to make me knock off a star since there is nothing else that comes near to the worth you get for the price. I populated it with a single firmware-updated Samsung F4EG drive it is not on the compatible drive list but works fine. 2GB per minute). I also tried a 7200rpm Seagate drive with the very same outcome, and also via the built-in FTP server. Duplicating files via Windows on a gigabit network, I get consistent compose speeds in the 18-25MBps array (which is about one. I do not have any purpose to believe these features will not function as advertised even though. My principal use is to stream material to XBMC, and it performs that function perfectly. It’s extremely green: According to the data sheet, it consumes 15. The web interface is a tiny bit clunky, so you might have to poke about to locate points (for illustration, the reboot selection is below &ltSystem Settings&gt). 7w while in use and 8. . It has lots of functions I have not tried, such as ddns, remote access, bittorrent, scheduled downloads, and so on. It does specifically what I was hoping it would. My secondary use is as a data backup, and it’s fast enough so that doesn’t take all day. 2w whilst sleeping. I also tried a 2TB Hitachi 5k3000 drive, but could not get it to format (it’s not in the compatibility list either)

The activation period expired and I could no lengthier open the software program. The DLink 320-110 1TB unit was fine. I have nothing against DLink other then offering a product and then not taking any duty for it, but will never ever use any “total recovery” product. The good point, Amazon is taking this junk back and supplying a refund. Referred to as DLink and they give me the 3rd party item excuse and offered no support. Following three attempts, they by no means replied. By no means again. The Total Recovery software program company has no telephone numbers except for Revenue and there you can only leave a message. It connected to the network with no concerns. The registration code I did have will not activate the product. . They do not appear to be really interested in helping. Nonetheless, the Total Recovery software program that came with it is worthless. Tech assistance is by e-mail only and states it will take X amount of company days for a response. The principal concern is that the product should be activated and you have to email the firm to get the code. They in no way responded with the code. This is a worthless product if you need to have assistance. Go to the Total Recovery website and check out out their make contact with information ahead of contemplating purchasing from them. I have been undertaking IT for over 20 many years so I am not a novice at this, however, this is the initial time I tried making use of this personal software. When you try out to activate on line, their server offers an error and states the product is not in their activation server. Fairly tough to configure as it rejected validated passwords from some of the workstations

You Might Be Interested In: